Home
lijn

Columns
lijn

Journalistieke artikelen
lijn

Opinie-artikelen
lijn

Interviews e.d.
lijn

Wetenschappelijke publicaties
lijn

Podcasts
lijn

Cultuur
lijn
Films
Muziek
Games
Boeken
Reclames

Fictie
lijn
Proza
Poëzie

Dossiers
lijn
Religie en internet
Medische ethiek
Politiek en religie
Esoterisch christendom
South Park
Perry Rhodan
Benedictus XVI
Bisdom 's-Hertogenbosch

Speciale acties
lijn
Meest spraakmakende theoloog
@Kathochismus
Wij blijven katholiek
Wij luiden voor Oranje

Kritieken en plaaggeesten
lijn

Contact
lijn

Disclaimer
lijn

Loftuitingen

"de Nico ter Linden van de RKK: speelse narratieve theologie"
- Ruard Ganzevoort (VU A'dam)

"eerste hulp bij vragen over populaire relikunst" - Trouw

"de meest geciteerde theoloog in de media" - Brabants Dagblad

"een van de geheime wapens
van de katholieke kerk"
- NRC Handelsblad

"de angry bird onder de theologen"- isidorusweb.nl

"de Theoloog des Vaderlands"
- GoedGelovig.nl

"het midden tussen een gedreven docent en een begenadigd prediker" - De Scherper

Gottes Eifer / Heilig vuur
Recensie, Bijdragen, 17-06-09

Peter Sloterdijk is one of the most famous German philosophers alive today. The author of the Sphären-triology (1998, 1999, 2004) triggers mixed but always extreme reactions. The general public and press applaud his narrative and convincing style of writing as much as his fellow academics criticize this style as rather anecdotic and incoherent.

In his Sphären-triology Sloterdijk embarked on a mission to rewrite the history of ideas of the Western world. Gottes Eifer (awkwardly to be translated in English as "God’s zealousness") is a part of this mission. Sloterdijk describes the history of Judaism, Christianity and Islam as a continuing succession and perfection of the same religious concept: monotheism. Without explicitly stating so, Sloterdijk positions himself in a larger tradition of critical scholars who equal monotheism with intolerance, superiority, colonialism, racism and antifeminism. See for example Regina Schwartz, The Curse of Cain. The Violent Legacy of Monotheism (1997). The faith in one God excludes all 'others' as heretics or pagans both to be converted at all possible costs. While Sloterdijk’s ' observations are often witted - 'War is the conversation between the religions' (p. 25) - he interprets the monotheistic tradition exclusively in terms of 'separatism', 'submission' and 'conquest'.

Going from one major religious character to the next (Abraham, Moses, Paul, Augustine and Muhammed) Sloterdijk concludes that the 'supremacy of the personal God led inevitably to the subordination of the faithful'. (p. 83) While totally neglecting important religious figures as for example Jesus or Luther, Sloterdijk lashes out at Abraham ‘whose success was based on the satisfaction of the faithful that they would gain a part of God's sovereignty by subordinate to Him' (p. 28) and Saint Augustine 'whose theological absolutism enlarged the diabolical aspect of God to a sacred terrorism' (63).

I was shocked by Sloterdijk's theorizing about monotheistic religion. The author hides his oversimplifications beneath a highly hermetic-philosophical language, undoubtfully tantalizing most of his readers.

Peter Sloterdijk, Gottes Eifer. Vom Kampf der drei Monotheismen, Verlag der Weltreligionen: Frankfurt am Main (2007), ISBN 978-34-5871-004-2, 18x11, 218 p., € 17,80.
Translated in Dutch by Frans van Zetten, Heilig vuur. Over de strijd tussen jodendom, christendom en islam, Boom: Amsterdam (2008), ISBN 978-90-8506-588-3, 14x23, 160 p., € 22,95.

Bron: Deze recensie is gepubliceerd in het wetenschappelijk tijdschrijft Bijdragen 70 (2009, nr. 3), p. 491-492.

...

Op alle pagina's is een disclaimer van toepassing. Deze site wordt niet gesponsord, noch door reclame financieel ondersteund.
Overgenomen teksten zijn van de eigenaar van deze site zelf of noemen hem bij name.

Valide CSS!